LogoRedline
$get_playbook
redline.dev~main

01
Case Study 01Nexus CLI · Developer Tooling

From commit-log README
to a docs site developers bookmarked.

Nexus CLI had 3,200 GitHub stars and a README that read like an internal Slack thread. Adoption was flatlining. The install section alone had four contradictory commands.

Act I — The Mess
README.md

# nexus-cli

A command-line tool for ████████████ and ████████████████.

## Installation

To install nexus-cli you need to first make sure you have the correct version of node installed (see prerequisites below, note that some systems may require additional configuration). Then run the following command after cloning the repository and navigating to the project root directory:

$ git clone ... && cd nexus && npm install && npm run build && npm link

Note: see CONTRIBUTING.md for more info. Known issues tracked in issues tab.

Last updated: commit 3f8a2c1 — "fix typo in readme"

nexus-cliv2.4.1

Deploy and manage microservices from your terminal. Works with any Docker-compatible registry.

# Install in 30 seconds

$ npm install -g nexus-cli

$ nexus init

Act II — The Method
01
Audit

Catalogued 47 pages. Found 12 dead links, 3 conflicting install guides.

02
IA Rebuild

Collapsed 9 nav sections into 3: Get Started, Reference, Guides.

03
Tone Pass

Cut average sentence length from 28 words to 14. Removed 1,400 passive constructions.

04
Code Samples

Rewrote all 34 code blocks to be copy-pasteable with zero modification.

05
Ship

Deployed with redirects. Zero broken links. Changelog published.

Act III — The Result
−68%

Support tickets tagged #docs-confusion in the 90 days following relaunch. The team stopped triaging questions that the docs now answered.

+340%

avg. time-on-page

4.8★

developer NPS (was 2.1)

3 weeks

full delivery timeline

02
Case Study 02Aperture API · API-First SaaS

API docs that made developers
stop opening support tickets.

Aperture's reference docs were technically accurate but practically useless. The auth guide linked to a PDF. Error codes lived in a spreadsheet. Integration time averaged 4.5 days. It needed to be 45 minutes.

Act I — The Mess
authentication.md

# Authentication

Aperture uses OAuth 2.0 with PKCE for authentication. To get started you will need to register an application in the developer portal and obtain your client_id and client_secret. Note that depending on your plan you may or may not have access to certain scopes. See the scopes reference document (link below) for more information about which scopes are available. The token endpoint is located at ████████████████████ and accepts POST requests with the parameters described in the table on page 4 of the API specification PDF.

⚠ Note: The PDF may be outdated. Check Slack #api-updates for latest info.

# Authenticate in 3 steps

1.
Register your app → dashboard.aperture.io/apps/new
2.
Exchange code for token

# POST /oauth/token

grant_type = "authorization_code"

code = YOUR_CODE

client_id = YOUR_CLIENT_ID

3.Use Bearer token in all requests

✓ Token auto-refreshes. No manual rotation needed.

Act II — IA Decisions
Endpoint Grouping
Before

47 endpoints listed alphabetically

After

6 resource groups by user intent

Error Codes
Before

Table of 200 codes, no context

After

Inline, next to each endpoint with fix guidance

Auth Flow
Before

Linked to external OAuth spec PDF

After

Self-contained 3-step guide with runnable cURL

Rate Limits
Before

Buried in FAQ section, page 11

After

Persistent sidebar widget on every endpoint page

Act III — The Result
4.5d → 45m

Average developer integration time. Measured over 312 new API consumers in the 60 days post-launch.That's 10× faster. Not a rounding error.

+52 NPS

developer net promoter score

1.4M

docs page views / year

03
Case Study 03Vessel OSS · Open Source

Docs that turned
lurkers into contributors.

Vessel had 11,000 stars and 38 active contributors. The CONTRIBUTING.md was last touched two years before I arrived. First-time contributors were opening issues just to ask how to open a PR.

Act I — The Mess
CONTRIBUTING.md

## Contributing

Please read CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting a PR. Make sure to run ████████████████ and ████████████ before pushing. If you have questions, open an issue or ask in ████████████████████.

## License

MIT

(CONTRIBUTING.md was last modified 2 years ago)

# 847 open issues · last release: 14 months ago

Contributing to Vesselgood first issue

First contribution? You're 10 minutes away from your first merged PR.

# 1. Fork and clone

$ gh repo fork vessel-oss/vessel --clone

# 2. Install and run tests

$ make dev && make test

# 3. Pick an issue tagged good-first-issue

→ github.com/vessel-oss/vessel/issues?q=good+first+issue

✓ All tests passing in CI before you push. That's it.

Act II — Style Guide Excerpts
VoiceTone System

Write to the developer reading at 11pm, not to a committee approving a spec. Use "you" and "your".

Code SamplesCode Standards

Every code sample must run without modification. No <YOUR_TOKEN_HERE> placeholders without a link to get the token.

HeadingsIA Rules

Headings are tasks, not topics. "Authentication" → "Authenticate your app in 3 steps".

ErrorsError Coverage

Every error message in the product must have a corresponding docs page. No exceptions.

Act III — The Result
+312%

New contributors in the 6 months after the docs rewrite. The project went from 38 → 157 active contributors without a single marketing push.

1.8M

docs page views / year

0

"how do I contribute?" issues

4 weeks

delivery, fully embedded

Free Resource

The Documentation Playbook

The exact frameworks used across every case study above. 47 pages. No fluff. Free with your email.

F-01Diagnostic

The Audit Protocol

A 47-point checklist for diagnosing broken documentation before writing a single word. Covers IA, tone, coverage gaps, and dead ends.

[ ] Navigation: Can a new user find the Quick Start in < 3 clicks?

[ ] Code samples: Do all examples run without modification?

[ ] Error coverage: Does every error code have a resolution path?

[ ] Tone: Count passive constructions. Target: < 10% of sentences.

[ ] ...

download to read →
F-02Methodology

The 3-Act Case Study Framework

How to structure any documentation project as a narrative: the mess, the method, and the metric. Used across all three case studies above.

Act I: Document the before state.

→ Screenshot the original. Note every friction point.

Act II: Map the decisions.

→ Each IA change needs a reason. Write it down.

Act III: Measure the after.

→ ...

download to read →
F-03Style Guide

Developer Voice System

A tone and style framework built specifically for technical documentation. Covers sentence structure, code sample standards, and heading hierarchy.

Rule 1: Write to the developer at 11pm.

Rule 2: Headings are tasks, not topics.

Rule 3: Every code sample must run.

Rule 4: Errors need resolution paths.

Rule 5: ...

download to read →
47 pages · PDF · Free

Download the Documentation Playbook

One email. No drip sequence. Just the PDF.